McCartney Times

Jack White on why The Beatles are better The Rolling Stones

Jack White on why The Beatles are better The Rolling Stones

Jack White on why The Beatles are better The Rolling Stones
August 04
09:49 2024

The debate of The Beatles versus the Rolling Stones is usually a difficult one. For music fans everywhere, the choice between the two rock and roll leaders is the ultimate musical dilemma. The impact of both groups is immeasurable; both of their discographies are packed with gold, and both are treated rightly as history-changing acts that forever altered the sound and face of music. But for Jack White, there is only one correct answer: The Beatles. It’s not even an answer he faults on or doubts for a second. In fact, White doubles down, saying that not only does he prefer the Beatles, but he considers the Stones to be little more than a copycat of them and of anyone else that Jagger thought he could get a hit from or “whatever the hippest thing was”.

Read more, click link below…

Source: Jack White on why The Beatles are better The Rolling Stones

About Author

Martin Nethercutt

Martin Nethercutt

Martin A Nethercutt is a writer, singer, producer and loves music. Creative Director at McCartney Studios Editor-in-Chief at McCartney Times Creator-in-Chief at Geist Musik President (title) at McCartney Multimedia, Inc. Went to Albert-Schweitzer-Schule Kassel Lives in Playa del Rey From Kassel, Germany Married to Ruth McCartney

Related Articles

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Only registered users can comment.